Data quality has always mattered; what’s changed is what depends on it.
As the scale of automation, analytics and AI has escalated, so have the possible consequences of bad quality data. Where before bad data might have delayed a report, the impact has now become a flawed model output, an incorrect automated decision, or an action taken by an agent without a human in the loop to catch the error.
Concurrently, data ecosystems are vast and only growing in complexity; data moves faster, across more systems, through more pipelines, with more consumers depending on it. While traditional data quality approaches can tell you if your data is right, they don’t tell you whether something has broken, drifted or gone stale before it causes damage, which is where observability takes center stage.